What GCs Exploring NFT, Web3 Opportunities Need to Know – Foley & Lardner LLP


This article originally appeared in Law.com on May 20, 2022. It is republished here with permission.

Companies across every industry are jumping into non-fungible tokens (NFTs), seeking to seize what they perceive as huge business opportunities.

Attorneys working in the space see myriad reasons to be bullish, despite a recent plunge in NFT sales and a host of tricky legal and regulatory issues companies entering the field must navigate.

NFTs are digital certificates registered on a blockchain, a ledger spread across decentralized computer networks. NFTs can be everything from digital art and collectibles to a plot of land in the virtual world known as the metaverse. The digital certificates are a key cog in Web3, a new iteration of the internet built on blockchains.

Missing opportunities in this emerging field could be catastrophic, said Louis Lehot, a partner with Foley & Lardner in California.

“Businesses that fail to evolve will cease to be competitive,” he said.

Some companies already are unleashing bold moves. Earlier this month, video game publisher Square Enix sold off many of its major video game properties, such as Tomb Raider, to fund its entry into the NFT space.

Those making such moves are undeterred by a nearly 92% drop in NFT sales in the first week of May, compared with the all-time high last September, according to data from market tracker NonFungible.

Meanwhile, NFT startups raised $2.4 billion in the first quarter, representing 25% of all blockchain funding. Lehot said that shows the market is going strong, and has barely slowed despite the transaction drop.

“The flow of capital into new transactions is still at a breakneck pace,” Lehot said. “We’ve got deals as if nothing happened in the public markets.”

Early Movers

Rob Potter, a partner with Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton in New York City, said established brands will have varying degrees of success selling NFTs to mainstream, less technically savvy fans.

Potter is well-versed on how companies can interact with NFTs and Web3. He authored a piece for the Association of Corporate Counsel late last year offering advice to GCs on the subject.

He said tying NFTs into more traditional marketing opportunities and promotional benefits, like customer loyalty programs or exclusive products, is a safer bet.

For example, Clinique leveraged its loyalty program earlier this year by offering members an opportunity to win exclusive NFTs tied to products to be released each year for the next decade.

In March, rock band Kings of Leon cut out music publishers by releasing its latest album as an NFT. It deleted all unsold NFTs after two weeks of sales, with no more being made.

These examples are simply the tip of the iceberg, Lehot said. For example, mobile developers can use Web3 to distribute apps directly to customers without going through app stores. He added that going through Big Tech costs developers 25-30% of gross revenue and can be unreliable at times.

Those developers could even choose to cut out payment systems, by transacting with self-issued tokens or NFTs.

General counsel should consider which parts of their businesses are digital and require transactions through Big Tech entities, attorneys say. If blockchains and Web3 can cut out those middlemen, that business might be well-suited to experiment with NFTs.

Navigating Risks

Max Dilendorf, a New York City attorney specializing in cryptocurrencies and Web3, said venturing into NFTs and other blockchain technologies brings big opportunities but also big risks.

He said general counsel must make sure their businesses are in compliance with money laundering regulations, such as the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970— commonly called the Bank Secrecy Act.

While that might sound surprising to the uninitiated, Dilendorf said NFTs carry a money-laundering risk, since decentralized technology makes their transactions untraceable.

Once legal teams have covered that territory, Dilendorf said they should brush up on the regulatory landscape, which is in flux.

Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler last month announced plans to step up regulation of blockchain technologies and to nearly double the size of the agency’s Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit.

Potter said that working with experienced partners, including outside counsel, can help GCs navigate the regulations.

“That’s who you want to start with to get the benefit of that perspective, because it’s moving rapidly,” Potter said.

Companies also should get comfortable with the idea of selling an extremely risky asset, Dilendorf said, referencing the recent drop in NFT prices.

The average price of an NFT was about $1,400 in April, according to NonFungible, down from $4,000 in February.

He said buyers should be given disclosures and made to understand their investment can drop to zero at any time.

“This way, you protect yourself against future claims,” Dilendorf said, emphasizing. “[This way,] your buyer cannot come to you and say ‘I’ve lost $5,000, and I want my money back.’”

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *